From Ivan Pavlov to Psychotronic Torture: Creating a sexually conditioned response

For some women, it's taboo to talk about their sexual experiences. Some women are conditioned to be modest, refined, and to “not offend.” At least, this is how many people in the world would rather experience the female gender. We are taught to not openly discuss our sexual experiences or sexual relationships and if we do openly talk about our sexual experiences this often get women labeled as either “whores” or “lacking class,” and despite the strides that have been made regarding gender issues, many women are still confined to domestic servitude in their gender role whether we care to admit or not. This gender role stereotype expects some women to remain passive, submissive, and subservient to their husbands and children, but I’m going to break beyond the barrier of silent submission, beyond the stigma of actually possessing a sexual drive.

After being celibate for over 5 years, I purchased a new cell phone. It wasn’t a smartphone and its abilities were very limited, but its cost was very affordable and so I upgraded this piece of technology as it could be afforded by any college student working a part-time job. This cell phone came with a completely new ring tone I hadn’t heard before. Immediately following this cell phone purchase, I met a guy and we started dating. We soon began fooling around and this new ring tone would become the neutral cue that went on to predict a biologically relevant event in my life; the anticipation of sexual intercourse. Similar to the experiments conducted by Ivan Pavlov and his dogs, Pavlov demonstrated how dogs could become conditioned to hearing a bell and anticipate an enjoyable event; the consumption of food after a period of food deprivation. This is the study of neurobiological learning and memory. After repeated predictive pairings, Pavlov’s dogs were conditioned to anticipate food at the sound of a bell, which caused them to salivate. For me, it was the repeated predictive pairing of my new ring tone in the cell phone call from my new friend with the anticipation of the biologically relevant event; sexual intercourse (repeated predictive pairings after a period of deprivation). The biological response to the sound of this new ring tone, which would also display his phone number, became the audio and visual cues I would respond to through a stimulated learned response from past memory, thereby releasing cervical fluids in vaginal discharge in anticipation of sex; vaginal discharge. Such studies inform human psychophysiological aspects of learning, memory, and conditioning.

This was uncharted territory as far as I was concerned. Never have I acquired such a learned and conditioned response from anyone in my past sexual relationships. What were the factors contributing to this learned response? I am a Targeted Individual who is experiencing electronic assaults and psychotronic torture. Was the psychotronic torture contributing to my learned response? Was my harsh deprivation of long-term celibacy contributing to this conditioned response? Or was the antisocial hostility of the electronic targeting and psychotronic torture dulling my senses to the point I now had the IQ of a canine? Do many people wonder what is the purpose of these mind control experiments utilizing psychotronic torture? If not for unethical inhumane experiments in human consciousness, what for? Scientists have long been interested in behavioral modification and behavioral control. Could this be a new area of study for grooming women for when they expect sexual intercourse? Grooming takes place in a myriad of ways in antisocial behaviors; grooming for sex through alcohol or drug consumption, grooming for behavior through psychotronic torture. Prosocial grooming takes place through prosocial structured discipline and prosocial educational learning. But electronic assaults and psychotronic torture are part of antisocial grooming. It’s not that I found the conditioned Pavlovian response undesirable, it’s just I feel violated by the gang stalking, electronic assaults, and psychotronic torture and I wish for them to stop. I would have to say, any woman with an ounce of sexual desire for her man would find this conditioned response exciting. However, if a third-party is involved in creating this sexual response, it should be outlawed. Orgasm by third-party proxy which is unconsented is just so wrong. Orgasm by neurobiological learning and memory, free from third-party involvement, beautiful.

I have to ask, how ethical would it be to conduct an extensive research study based on researching a topic in sexology with a group of consenting, age-relevant, sexually active women? Older women surely wouldn’t make good test subjects for a variety of reasons. Right? Could this experiment be re-created in a laboratory to illustrate a point, both using non-psychotronic torture and utilizing psychotronic torture in two different test groups? I think not, because it would be an inhumane and unethical experiment that would most likely contribute to the onset of undesired side-effects like post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It’s important to note I have suffered from PTSD, sexual abuse, and family violence in the past.

Like sustenance, danger is biologically relevant, and neutral cues can take on great salience when they predict a threat to survival. In anxiety disorders such as PTSD, this type of conditioned fear fails to extinguish, and reminders of traumatic events can cause pathological conditioned fear responses for decades after danger has passed. I remember experiencing the physiological signs experienced with feeling danger, becoming overwhelmingly fearful, sweaty palms, an overwhelming sense of doom. I would experience this every time I would have to go on a job interview and any time, I would need a dentist appointment.

So, I am bailing on the silent women profile because it does not serve me to remain silent about these violations which both threaten me through electronic physical and sexual assaults and with psychotronic torture.