Wireless Electromagnetic Assault Torture: A Criminal Profile (Part 3)
I had asked the question, while reading “Creating Bodies: Eating Disorders as Self-Destructive Survival,”
“If transformative relationships must be embodied, must possess a collaboration from a distinct position of knowing, thereby, “anchoring” the subjectivity of the distinct body with coherent identity,” where was this “anchoring” present in the invisible wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture?”
Because the abuse, in effect, seemed to “untie the boat from its dock.” That is to say, from its own super-ego. Furthermore, “What was the hoped for transformational outcome of the wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture for the targeted victim?” Because the technology is suspect of mind control and the malevolent use of emotion as a dark mirror of the therapeutic process it becomes suspect, at least in my opinion, as a diagnostic tool for determining the level of psychic stability in individuals as a diagnostic model to evaluation of military personnel who are trained in SERE operations which imparts skills in the soldier to resist methods of mind control tactics if captured by enemy forces. However, this wireless technology also, too, holds the potential for real world destructiveness (Weiland, 1996). When the psychoanalytic techniques of mind control are used against subjects, they can possess very real malignant and malign purposes. Consider the U.S. federal government’s use of licensed medical practitioners in the execution of torture during the Afghanistan war at Guantanamo Bay through the process of illegal detention post 9/11 which violated our own policies as well as the Geneva Convention. We can also consider the torture techniques used at CIA black sites as well as programs instituted at private juvenile detention centers such as Provo Canyon. This last one requires a jaunt through the inner workings of the Joint Commission of the United States. A commission based in allegiance to “big private money.” This is one of the reasons why I am tying the Dark Triad and the Dark Tetrad to the personality traits most likely interested in using this technology against innocent populations (Krick, Tresp, Vatter, Ludwig, Wihlenda, & Rettenberger, 2016; Lyons & Jonason, 2015). It is also for this reason I am tying the abusive torture to the character trait of Republican voter present in “Trumpeter” supporters with their demonstrated character of “white male self-entitlement.”
How Feminist Psychoanalysts Uncovered the Roots for a Fixed Drive Towards Paternal Male Privilege
Luce Irigaray concludes, “our imaginary still functions in accordance with the schema established through Greek mythologies and tragedies (Irigaray, 1991, pg. 36).” Irigaray describes Clytemnestra’s murder as the archaic murder of the mother that established the right of the father. Aeschylus’ trilogy, the Oresteia, portrays the murder of Agamemnon by his wife Clytemnestra and, subsequently, the murder of Clytemnestra together with her lover Aegisthus, by their son Orestes.
“ … in the final part of the Oresteia, Orestes is tried by the Athenian High Court presided over by Athena, with Apollo taking Orestes' defense. In this trial, Apollo argues that the murder of Agamemnon by Clytemnestra is a bigger crime than the murder of Clytemnestra by her son Orestes because the child does not belong to the mother but to the father. Orestes' duty was, therefore, to avenge his father’s death by murdering his mother. In Athena’s casting vote that declares Orestes innocent we have the final dictum that the child belongs to the father, not to the mother, and in Apollo’s passionate defense of Orestes we have the birth of the paternal superego. The paternal principle having thus been established … (Weiland, 1996).”
Thus, in this sense, it marks the beginning of Western culture and of the legal state; and it also marks male privilege right to inflict violence against women as well as other men.
It is at the root of the patriarchial rule of the tyrannical King, throughout history, that repeats and establishes the right of the father and establishing the paternal symbolic order’s right to wage interspecies war. What may not be known about Agamemnon’s murder is the reason why Clytemnestra murdered her husband in the first place. Before Agamemnon sets out to wage war with Troy he takes his daughter Iphigenia and sacrifices her to the gods in hopes for a successful campaign of war against Troy. Agamemnon chooses a “lesser object”, his female daughter, and not his son Orestes. Throughout history, male importance (idealization, worth and value, and the desire of phallic strength) have been repeated time and time again by both men and women. Even in China, the practice of aborting a female fetus in favor of trying for a male has been practiced and culturally repeated. As a side note, I want to mention that in abusive relationships women’s children are seen as an extension of the female victim and so, can become victims of abuse as well. Something that deviates from the ancient practice of venerated and revered forms in patriarchial culture where the firstborn male was idealized and valued. At the level of psychic reality the myth expresses the emergence of the paternal superego as a protection needed to cope with the inner persecutions by the “bad and ambivalent maternal object.”
“Mother’s power results from infantile love, hate, greed, envy, and need, and from the internalization of an identification with those bits of mother that correspond to these feelings. In this sense, father provides an object untainted by these primitive feelings and ready to be used as a “liberator,” that is, as a defense (Wieland, 1996).”
In my next post, I will discuss how wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture acts as an artificial super-ego used to turn a subject/victim’s own superego against itself for purposes of mind control and regression. If the wish to be like mother remains unworked through, or if the culture forbids any feminine identifications (weak, slow, dependent, passive) matricide would be a potent reason for defense.
In “The dissolution of the Oedipus complex,” it is a massive traumatic event that centers on the fear of castration (Freud, 1924). It is this event that structures the dichotomy of a culture rooted in feminine and masculine identifications with the destruction of the paternal couple. In order to save his penis, the boy gives up his mother and substitutes her by his penis. In this rendering of the outcome of the Oedipus complex masculine narcissism incorporated in the penis replaces the longing for mother and an accompanying dread of castration. Whichever way we read it, this is Oedipus’s final outcome.
If we understand wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture as a masculine creation as the psychic defense of the perpetrator (a little boy, and to some extent, possibly a little girl) to ward off psychic anxieties toward the maternal object, internal fears surrounding this dreaded object, we can understand the masculine defensive move towards father’s phallic superiority, as an object untainted by primitive feelings of infantile anxieties of love, greed, hate, envy, and need acting as “the liberator with which to purge these feelings from the perpetrator and transfer them onto or into the object other (i.e. the victim) via wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture. It is a defensive mechanism to ward off possible castration. We can come to the conclusion the perpetrator has suffered a psychic splitting, a violent and traumatic rupture has taken place, and may be a victim-cum-perpetrator of early childhood abuse, neglect, and maltreatment.
“… depriving or disappointing environments create murderers and soldiers and bankers whose appetite for money is insatiable and immoral. Chessick (1996) asserted that there is a powerful instinctive aggression in human beings which allows us to exploit our neighbors capacity for work, to use him sexually without his consent, to seize his possessions, to humiliate, torture and kill him, but he also insinuates that the secret of why sadistic torture, sexual abuse and rape generate so much intense pleasure and why terrorism, violence and brutality generate so much narcissistic elation lies in the acting out of the archaic fantasies by pathological individuals for whom the childhood environment was neither average or expectable (Holmes, 2013, pg. 144-145).”
Returning to the secret inner workings of the Joint Commission of the United States, a commission that is extremely influential as they accredit hospitals, rehabilitation facilities, nursing homes, and residential treatment facilities of all kinds that manage “troubled individuals” or individuals with mental disabilities such as autism. These institutions are privately funded, residential care facilities. In a podcast called “Trapped in Treatment” accessible on iHeartRadio and produced by London Audio and Warner Brothers, the podcasters detail the inhumane treatment of “troubled teens” institutionalized in these private residential facilities. Legal field lawyers refer to the “standard of care” defined as what is considered reasonable, appropriate, and prudent in a particular context. This applies to medicine, dentistry, or architecture and also to the discussion with behavioral healthcare programs of troubled individuals whether residentially treated or not. There are guideposts, ethical standards in the relevant professions so the responsible programs hire appropriately trained medical professionals who are licensed by a state board. These include teachers, psychologists, social workers, and substance abuse professionals or treatment specialists. Each of these disciplines have a code of ethics, ideally. These programs would be reviewed, assessed, scrutinized in a positive way by responsible regulatory agencies. Agency accreditations are required to operate. Thus, responsible programs seek accreditation by the Joint Commission. This Joint Commission of the United States becomes a big deal. There are a number of organizations in the struggling teen industry that are behavioral health programs, that are respectful, but not perfect. They enhance the likelihood that facilities run programs ethically. So what’s the problem with this Joint Commission?
The Joint Commission is a quasi-governmental, non-profit run agency that is not run by the federal government. It is funded by the private facilities they serve. Thus, there appears to be a conflict of interest because the problem is the Joint Commission is a very powerful organization not run by the government. People trust them and believe the accreditation they hand out are “safe.” However, they barely investigate these facilities with the kind of discretion required to expose abuse. In fact, they give the facilities a “warning message” before they actively do an evaluation. “And 99% of all facilities seeking an accreditation receive it (iHeartRadio, London Audio, Warner Brothers, 2022).”
One might ask how does the Joint Commission enforce the standards of care? Surprisingly, the oversight of these facilities are shallow. Another problem is these treatment facilities represent big money. These facilities are in it to make a profit. It’s not about human welfare, but about profit margins and financial gains. These treatment facilities employ methods of mind control that are at the level of enhanced interrogation techniques used by the federal government in their black site facilities (Smith-Richards, J., & Cohen, J., 2024).
And, it is here, where I believe the use of wireless torture technologies may have originated in the operation that allows for perpetrators abusing “troubled individuals.” Both the acquisition of state funded healthcare and collusion with bad operators working within the healthcare systems themselves against an individual or the presence of a rogue network of criminal operators (i.e. gang/mafia). This is not too hard or far fetched to consider when we look to the recent events which took place aboard a Delta flight to Paris, France. A Russian national with American citizenship, by passed several checkpoints in security, snuck onto the flight unnoticed by Delta authorities (Reiss, Jackson, & Lybrand, 2024). Remember what I said in my previous post, “All lies seek collusion. And perversity is a lying relation to reality.”
Regarding the nature of wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture, the triumphant and aggressive embrace of the victim via the wireless electromagnetic frequency assault by the perpetrator represents a level of immaturity that negates ethical responsibility to others (i.e. infantile anxiety). It most definitely demonstrates the unconscious, unanalyze fantasies of men interested in exacting revenge against others during times of war rooted in the infantile anxiety stemming from primal scene loss; feelings of love, hate, greed, need and envy. In the chapter, “Psychoanalysis, Vulnerability, and War,” Eli Zaretsky writes:
“ as with Freud in 1919, the revolt against passivity is at the center of Butler’s explanation for why the American people so wholeheartedly followed triumphalist and aggressive policies that were obviously mired in weakness and insecurity. As with Klein and her followers in 1939, Butler argues that a mature response to aggression draws on our experience of infantile dependence on others, and experience that turns us into ethically responsible individuals (Harris & Botticelli et. al., 2010, pp. 196).”
Wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture moves the subject / victim towards a politic of vulnerability through the infliction of pain and suffering, fear and intimidation. This move is an unethical way to achieve, what I believe to be, a method of mind control and the subjugation of victims and groups. Not only does the technology induce physical pain and suffering, but it also induces mental anguish, intimidation and fear of mortal death for the purposes of controlling a population of subject / victims. In its silent articulation it speaks the language of rejection, “I don’t want or need you!” This is the opposite of mutual understanding, opposite the understanding of mutual separateness with the uniqueness of personal individuality as right rights bearing citizens, with the need for mutual recognition, mutual support, and the need for mutual respect of others. For this reason, it collapses the space of the third in recognition theory (Benjamin, 2018).
Furthermore, the technology possesses a threat to all U.S. citizens in that it violates the constitutional rights of U.S. Constitution. Namely, their Fourth Amendment right that protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment sets up the protection for all persons to be safe, secure, and free from unlawful searches of their person, as well as unlawful seizures of their body (i.e. sexual, physical, and cognitive). The technology also violates the Eighth Amendment, the constitutional right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. Although the Eighth Amendment deals with the with incarcerated groups, the technology nonetheless demonstrates that the unlawful seizure of the individual leads to a form of false imprisonment which ultimately leads to cruel and unusual punishment. Therefore, the technology can be construed as a form of false imprisonment. Throughout modern U.S. unfolding history, psychoanalysis has played an important role. Involvement with war allowed psychoanalysis deeper insights into the understanding of human vulnerability. Civil rights violation are a desecration of the very laws our U.S. Constitution seeks to uphold.
What checks merciless violence against one person towards another?
Freud claim that one way to thwart the success of self-destruction (“annihilation of the self”) is for the ego to “fend off its tyrant in time by the change round into mania” (i.e. manic defenses). However mania, overestimates the power of the subject and loses touch with reality. This character flaw is present in the unarticulated, silence of wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture. Traditionally, the historic U.S. cultural perspective assumes masculine power and strength as something “good” even portraying it as “divine providence.” On the other hand, feminine weakness is portrayed as “inferior”, as something inherently “bad.” Frank Summers in his critique of the U.S. character and the American representation of the self as a grandiose American identity, an identity that represents its key character traits (i.e. superiority) as something “all good.” “Tocqueville’s (1835) observation that American citizens were easily offended by any suggestion of the country’s limitations was a comment on American grandiosity (Harris & Botticelli et. al., 2010, pp. 167).” But in viewing historical political leadership of Rome, and even in ancient Athens, deferring to the trial of Socrates, the same response was received by Socrates from the high Athenian leaders, of whom he offended, which ushered in his demise. So this political character trait isn’t something unique to the United States alone. “Nonetheless, at the time the torture policy was approved, no thought was given to its long-term consequences beyond the need to show them “where in charge” (Harris & Botticelli et. al., 2010, pg. 169; Sands, 2008).” This outcome is analogue to the narcissistic patient’s effort to overcome humiliation via arrogant and abusive behavior toward others that incurs enmity instead of the desired admiration. Just as violent outbursts ultimately hurt others, and the thoughtless use of force against vulnerable populations or perceived enemies with ill-will throughout, incurs enmity instead of the desired admiration. This places the use of wireless electromagnetic assault torture in a very suspicious category. One that may coincide with the creation of Murder Inc. during the history of the Italian mafia during the early 20th century.
Sources:
Benjamin, J. (2018) Beyond Doer and Done To: Recognition Theory, Intersubjectivity and the Third. New York. Routledge.
Butler, J. (2009) Precarious Life. London. Verso.
Butler, J. (2021). The Force of Non-violence: An Ethico-Political Bind. New York. Verso.
Chessick, R. D. (1996) “Archaic Sadism.” Journal of American Academy of Psychoanalysis. Vol. 24. No. 4. (pp. 605-618).
First Do No Harm: The Paradoxical Encounters of Psychoanalysis, Warmaking, and Resistance. (2010) Eds., Adrian Harris and Steven Botticelli. Volume 45, Relational Perspective Book Series. New York. Routledge.
Freud, S. (1924) “The dissolution of the Oedipus complex.” In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.) The Standard Edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. (Vol. 19, pp.171-180). London. Hogarth Press.
Gentile, K. (2007) Creating Bodies: Eating Disorders as Self-Destructive Survival. London. The Analytic Press.
Homes, L. (2013) Wrestling with Destiny: The Promise of Psychoanalysis. New York. Routledge.
iHeart Radio, London Audio, Warner Brothers (Producers). “Trapped in Treatment.” Season 1. Episode 3. “It’s Not a School.” February 2, 2022. Retrieved November 3, 2024.
Irigaray, L. (1981) “The bodily encounter with the mother.” In the Irigaray Reader. Oxford. Basil Blackwell, 1991.
Reiss, R., Jackson, A., & Lybrand, H. (2024) “A woman bypassed multiple security checkpoints to get on a Delta flight to Paris. Here’s what we know.” CNN.com. Retrieved online December 4, 2024.
Sands, P. (2008) Torture team: Rumsfeld’s memo and the betrayal of American values. New York. MacMillan.
Smith-Richards, J., & Cohen, J. (2024) “This School for Autistic Youth Can Cost $573,200 a Year. It Operates with Little Oversight and Students Have Suffered.” ProPublica.org. Retrieved online December 4, 2024.
Wieland C. (1996) “Matricide and Destructiveness: Infantile Anxieties and Technological Culture. British Journal of Psychotherapy. Vol. 12. No. 3. (pp. 300-313).
