Wireless Electromagnetic Frequency Assault Torture: A Criminal Profile (Part 2)
Updated: December 5, 2024, 8:12 am EST
Yesterday, I discussed women’s oppression by dominant male patriarchy. I gave some examples on how dominant male patriarchy wounded women’s psyches with advertising campaigns to make them feel worthless following the women’s liberation movements. I also discussed briefly Christopher Bollas’ idea of the “unthought known” as well as Sue Grand’s writing of the “annihilation paradox” in paranoid-schizoid mechanisms as well as Julia Kristeva’s theory “matricide is our vital necessity” for proper human development of identity, separation, and individuation from the maternal body.
With regard to wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture, defensive mechanisms become a retreat from the reality of dependency, inferiority, and weakness which are associated with femininity. American psychoanalytic literature does not declare independence as a mental illness, but it appears, that dependency is regarded as a mental illness in American culture. That is to say, feminine weakness of any kind is typically repudiated and foreclosed upon. Funny, how our nation’s dependency on oil, on weapons, the militerized industrial complex, on advancing technological developments, on the excessive bleeding of financial institutions through greed as in the 2008–2009 banking crisis, the very things destroying our planet, are not considered illnesses. Nor are they penalized.
As “civilizations shape, and distort our drives, and this sometimes means, that violence and anger get acquired and imprinted with needs for power, revenge, and dramatic destruction (Holmes, 2013, pg. 146).” We will see the constant evolution of the reproduction of evil. I have often said that those things peculiar to human history never fully disappear; inquisitions, witch hunts, genocides, crucifixions, the wrongly accused. They merely evolve entirely into something all together new. Hence, wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture and the Targeted Individual. Thus, a person’s dependency on alcohol, illicit drugs, even sex, even their dependency on social services such as food stamps, Medicaid, Medicare are associated with feminine weakness and inferiority. Judith Butler asked the question how do “non-valuable” groups come to be labeled as “non-valuable.” She asked the question what are the mechanisms at work behind its insidious development. What is at play, behind the scenes, for this prejudicial treatment for certain groups who lack power. Poverty and low-income are something also associated with inferiority, dependency, and weakness (i.e. femininity). I propose these very mechanisms contribute to groups, nations, and individuals labeling as “non-valuable” and are at the social roots of contemporary disavowal. “Maltreatment from those on whom we depend creates conditions in which disavowal becomes an individual and social defense (Harris & Botticelli, et. al., 2010, pg. 365).” On the other hand, the character traits associated with white male entitlement, and now with the sensationalized case of P. Diddy Combs, black male entitlement possess the opposite traits of femininity. That is, of dependency, inferiority, and weakness. Most, but not all, males who possess forms of male self-entitlement hold title to independence, superiority, and strength. Male self-entitlement can be associated with the Dark Triad and Dark Tetrad of personality traits. These personality constellations are imbued with narcissism, psychopathy, machiavellianism, and in the dark tetrad, sadism is added. It is these types of personality constellations that are most likely to use wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture against certain groups, nations, and individuals (Krick, Tresp, Vatter, Ludwig, Wihlenda, & Rettenberger, 2016; Lyons& Johnson, 2015). Additionally, we can also theorize wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture is an act of defensive imitation of masculine power by a perpetrator who, himself or herself, lacks forms of control and power important to the dominant popular culture. Although it is unlikely the perpetrator is female, but since childbirth is a developmental milestone for all women (Holmes, 2008, pp. 29-52), it is likely the perpetrator might be a female who has never given birth, is in an uncommitted relationship, possibly unemployed, and is between the ages of 20–30 years of age. If it is a female, and she is employed, she most likely works in related fields of healthcare (Harrison, 2023). Violence against women is predominantly male driven. The following is a discussion regarding the gendering of human rights and women and the Latin American terrorist state written by Nancy Carroll Hollander. My apologies for its length but it’s important must not be overlooked:
“Male frustration and rage is often expressed through violence directly at women … While the determinants of male violence against women may be complex and multifold, the feminist psychoanalytic account suggests that one important source is linked to men’s need to deal with the dread they have experienced from early infancy of engulfment by the omnipotent mother … cross-cultural myths and rituals reveal … idealized over glorification of women or their devaluation and debasement. And, in either case, the female’s power is neutralized by the cultural rendering of her as either above or below male fear, which is thus contained through the fantasy of omnipotent control over a dichotomized object (Madonna/whore good/evil, pure/contaminated). However, male domination in the social sphere must be assured (and reassuring) at times through violent abuse of this potentially powerful object. The intrapsychic dynamics of women fashioned within the cultural matrix help to shape their role in gendered relations by preparing them to expect and often endure violent domination by men … in Brazil wife murder is a common crime, and a man may still be legally absolved on the grounds of honor if he claims his wife was unfaithful … physical and sexual abuse in the home represents over 70% of all reported incidences of violence against women in Brazil. And Brazilian law does not generally view rape, marital or otherwise, as a crime against an individual person, but rather as a crime against custom. In the United States, sexual assault is just as culturally syntonic as in Brazil: half of all women in the United States are raped at least once in their lifetime, and half of all adult women are battered in their own homes by husbands or lovers, a situation still legally condoned in some 30 states (Fauldi, 1991). Thus, in patriarchial culture - weather in developed or undeveloped countries - sexual abuse is so endemic that women learn to live in fear that even if they have not yet experienced a violent attack on their person, they may be victimized at any moment. The fear women live with means that they easily identify with feelings of violent victimization even if they have not been personally violently attacked. Indeed, male violence against women is a normative experience of everyday life and is reified in a culture that mirrors, permits, and instructs both men and women and it’s apparent inevitability … the generally accepted definition of traumatic stressors leading to the diagnostic category of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are those events “outside the range of usual human experience,” such as natural disasters or atrocities perpetrated by other human beings … However, Brown argues, the above definition is built on a notion of traumatic stressors being “outside the range of usual human experience,” which makes it a paradigm established from the privileged male point of view. This definition of trauma ignores the level of sexual violence that typifies the ordinary daily experience of women. Brown asserts that an accurate definition need to move beyond the public and male experience of trauma to the private and female experience of trauma carried out in secret and within the interpersonal realm. If the hegemonic definition of trauma is left to males of the privilege class, “real” trauma is that experience in which the dominant group is the perpetrator or source of the trauma. Brown suggest that the term insidious trauma be used to capture the traumatogenic effects of female oppression characteristic of a male dominant culture that normalized an eroticizes sexual assault and does violence in an ongoing way to the female spirit (Harris & Botticelli et al., 2010, pg. 282-284).”
I would like to further go on and reference, describe, and analyze the Latin American terrorist state which seems to embody the very characteristics of wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture. Nancy Carroll Hollander further writes:
“…as the terrorist state imposes an ongoing and insidious culture of trauma, subjecting the entire population - women and children as well as men - to a militarization of daily life and to life endangering conditions customarily associated with combat … we have only to regard that 30% of those who disappeared in Argentina during the infamous “Dirty War” were women … we shall also explore how its prisons, secret detention centers and concentration camps, the states infliction of torture subjects men as well as women to the complete and total humiliating degradation of psychic and physical integrity customarily associated with battering and rape … there is likely to be an exacerbation of customary gender differences as male-dominant institutions and ideology are reinforced … [Latin American] terror strikes out at the body politic with the goal of silencing critical consciousness and paralyzing political engagement in the popular classes. Often the only factor uniting the military and other right-wing sectors of society is their own terror of progressive ideology and redistributed policies promoted by the left. State terror develops a strategy that attacks specific individuals and groups who represent an articulate opposition to the status quo, and is also indiscriminately targets union members, individuals, relatives of known gorillas, unarmed political dissidents, or individuals simply suspicious in the eyes of those who randomly detain and secretly kidnap citizens in their own homes, their workplaces, and on the streets. The entire population becomes “victims of a doctrine of collective guilt.” Social discourse is aimed at paralyzing the population with this contradictory and paradoxical quality. The government’s rhetoric often refers to the war between “violence” (attributed to the political forces fighting representative government) and “order” (attributed to the representative state’s cleansing offensive against the enemies of Western Christian civilization), in this way masking the relationship between the two that characterizes the military and the paramilitary attack on civilized society … The widespread use of policies of disappearing, torturing, and murdering significant members of citizens is aimed at imposing a passive consensus within the population (Hollander, 1992) … Individual behavior is characterized by silence, inexpressiveness, inhibition, and self-censorship, all of which result in depoliticalization. In this situation, individuals become obedient and potentially punitive of self and others. One of the outstanding features of a terrorized population is the compulsion to deny reality, to refuse to bear witness to the sinister drama that oppresses the entire nation. Denial shields the individual from his own conscience and the internal or external demand to act in defiance of the systematic violation of basic human rights. As parents alter their vocabulary and their vision of reality in response to their children’s questions in order to protect them, they impose denial, repression, and censorship within the family, which contributes to the creation of an apolitical and self-censoring generation. The psychology of denial thus functions to sustain the politics of terror … psychological trauma is one of dehuminization, with the effects of inhibiting four important human capacities: the capacity to think lucidly, the capacity to understand truth, the capacity for empathetic response to the suffering of others, and the capacity to maintain hope in the future … with social forms of response no longer available to permit the expression of aggression toward the real source of suffering and loss, aggressive attitudes and behavior increase in personal life, being displaced onto less dangerous situations and on to safer objects. Because it is impossible to live for long in acute pain or permanent collapse, adaptations to the catastrophic conditions of State terror is accompanied by general impoverishment of psychological resources in adults as well as in children. Common psychological responses include the development of dissociative defenses, the pathological regulation of emotional states, and the emergence of a fragmented identity. The Latin American terrorist state imposes … As the perpetrators of state terror as the report of the Argentinian National Commission of the Disappeared (1986) indicates, the original goal of creating a climate of intimidation and fear aimed at silencing a population at some point shifts to “the perverse exhileration of absolute, uncontrolled dominion over others,” which [becomes] an end in itself, a way of life … economic policies favoring elite groups at the expense of the popular classes, whose traditional means of struggling for progressive redistributive policies have been smashed. As labor unions are closed down, intervened, or declared to be illegal, male and female workers, employees, intellectuals, and professionals no longer have legitimate means of defending their class and sectoral interests. Rising unemployment rates, forced wage cuts and an escalating cost of living all reflect the assault on the popular classes' quality of life. People’s energies are increasingly drained in the frantic effort to defend themselves against the ruthless attack on their material conditions of survival. With freedom of speech and all forms of organized collective struggle prohibited, this struggle for survival is intensified, physically exhausting the body and demoralizing the psyche … It is in the acute trauma of the torture situation … that the terrorists state crystallizes its assault on civil society. Torture submits women and men alike to the most heinous crimes against humanity at the hands of “instrumental torturers,” whose brutal sadism represents the implementation of a savage policy to do everything possible to kill off opposition to the totalitarian power of the political and economic elite in whose interests the torturer is carried out (Harris & Botticelli et al., 2010, pg. 284-287).”
The nature of wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture displays to me, based on my psychoanalytic readings and the text quoted above, that the population of perpetrators using the technology on their victims possess a previously split off grandiosity with its associated sense of entitlement. Like the wrongful invasion of Iraq, post 9/11, where American split off grandiosity with its associated sense of entitlement sprang from the failure of the Vietnam War. In wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture, here too, exists a previously split off grandiosity with its associated sense of entitlement from a previous failure. I have previously stateded the quality of the silent articulations in psychoanalytic interactions put forth in the language of wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture as the language of an anal-sadistic universe based in a permutation, or imitation of reality (Chasseguet-Smirgel, 1985). In short, a lie! In the perverse creation of an alternate reality where pleasure is connected with transgression and boundary violation. Where difference is sadistically abolished in tearing down another and, thereby, reality is destroyed in the creation of a new and alternate reality. All lies seek collusion. And lies come into rivalry with the truth. Lying sustains the illusion of independence from everything that is not his/her own creation. The problem is in cooperation rooted in the collusion. “Ruth Stein’s (2005) work on perverse pacts which she defines as a relationship between two accomplices, a mutual agreement that serves to cover over or turn the common mutual gaze of the accomplices from the catastrophic biographical events that had befallen each of them (Harris & Botticelli et. al., 2010).”
“A social reality built on cynical lies evokes a painful turn away from what we know to be true. But the disavow works in two directions. As Howard Stein (2000) has argued, a media that turns away from painful truths, such as the body count of Iraqi citizens, not only colludes with government to trick the population into quiescence, but also colludes with the population’s social defense against knowing what it knows ( Harris & Botticelli et al., 2010, pg. 363).”
How does a perverse pact fit into wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture? When political leaders, and other leaders such as medical leaders and religious leaders in the community, collude with family members for “a particular expression of a family member’s sense of self and identity,” vulnerable and innocent populations are violated in perverse and sadistic ways through mind control programs. All one has to do is look to conversion therapy programs of mind control rooted in religious ideologies that repudiate homosexuality. All one has to do is look at the formation of illegal detention camps post 9/11 under the Bush administration, in addition to juvenile detention centers such as Provo Canyon.
“… the existence of torture in illegal detention sites will be framed by government, media, and populace as the work of a few bad apples. Such decontextualizations and dehistoricizations are at the heart of the individualistic thinking proper to bourgeois ideology; to fit our experience to existing narratives, we “learn” to ignore the links that would render counternarratives meaningful, for example, narratives in which such phenomena are understood as systematic. Indeed, for many, systematic narrative simply don’t make sense. For some, notably those who have some thing to gain from supporting the status quo, be it material reward or social acceptance, adopting these narrative frames might involve cognitive dissonance — it is not in the interest to know what they know. Others are aware that collusion with dominant narratives demands a suppression of important parts of self. But we want to trust our leaders even when we suspect they do not have our interest in mind. As Ferenczi (1933/1955) has noted, maltreatment often issues in a wish to keep the perpetrators good, a wish that makes us distrust our own sense (when a trusted leader like Colin Powell said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, [Lynn Layton] found [herself] beginning to doubt what [she] knew). For those who are aware of how they suffer from existing power relations, systematic narratives that run counter to the dominant frame make perfect sense and some, especially those whose life depend on it, resist. Yet many of us in this situation too often feel helpless to challenge individualistic narratives in any way then by yelling back at the television or writing articles like this one (Harris & Botticelli, et. al., 2010, pg. 363-364).
I remember very clearly the feeling of apprehension, concern, and doubt I had over reading the governments narrative of re-capitulating an attack in the Middle East after 9/11. Something seemed wrong to me, but at the time, I did know what. I doubted the varacity of some the government’s accusations. I was told to keep quite or else suffer retribution for questioning the authority of the federal government.
Sources:
Benjamin, J. (2018) Beyond Doer and Done To: Recognition theory, inter-subjectivity and the third. New York. Rutledge.
Bollas, C. (1987) The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. New York. Columbia University Press.
Butler, J. (2021) The Force of Nonviolence: An ethico-political bind. New York. Verso.
Chasseguet-Smirgel, J. (1985) Creativity and Perversion. London. Free Association Books.
Ferenczi, S. (1933/1955) Confusion of Tongues Between Adults and Children. In “Final contributions to the problems and methods of psychoanalysis,” (pp. 156-167). New York. Basic Books. (Original work published in 1933).
First Do No Harm: The paradoxical encounters of psychoanalysis, warmaking, and resistance. (2010) Eds., Adrian Harris and Steven Botticelli. Volume 45, Relational Perspective Book Series. New York. Routledge.
Gentile, K. (2007) Creating Bodies: Eating disorders as self-destructive survival. London. The Analytic Press.
Grand, S. (2000) The Reproduction of Evil: A clinical and cultural perspective. London. The Analytic Press.
Harrison, M. (2023) Just As Deadly: The psychology of female serial killers. New York. Cambridge University Press.
Homes, L. (2008) The Internal Triangle: New theories of female development. New York. Jason Aronson.
_________(2013) Wrestling with Destiny: The promise of psychoanalysis. New York. Routledge.
Krick, A., Tresp, S., Vatter, M., Ludwig, A., Wihlenda, M., & Rettenberger, M. (2016) The Relationship Between the Dark Triad, the Moral Judgement Level, and the Student’s Disciplinary Choice. Journal of Individual Differences, Vol. 37. No. 1. (pp. 24–30).
Kristeva, J. (1989) Black Sun. New York. Columbia University Press.
Lyons, M., & Johnson, P. (2015) Dark Triad, Tramps, and Thieves. Journal of Individual Differences. Vol. 36. No. 4. (pp. 315–220).
Stark, E. (2007) Coercive Control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York. Oxford University Press.
Stein, R. (2005) Why Perversion? “False love” and the perverse pact. International Journal of Psychoanalysis. Vol. 86. No 3. (pp. 775-799).
Walker, M. B. (1998) Philosophy of the Maternal Body: Reading silence. New York. Routledge.
Wieland, C. (1996) Matricide and Destructiveness: Infantile anxieties and technological culture. British Journal of Psychotherapy. Vol. 12. No. 3. (pp. 300-313).
