Wireless Electromagnetic Frequency Assault Torture: A Criminal Profile (Part 5)

With regard to wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture, as I have experienced, anyone who has been overcome by a force stronger than themselves, and brought to the edge of execution by another human being understands the psychological impacts of trauma on the body. The technological use of wireless electromagnetic frequency assault seeks to commandeer, control and manipulate/ exploit the subject / victim on multiple levels including emotional, cognitive, psychological, and physiological (heartbeat, blood pressure, body temperature, and blood sugar, etc.) Because it manipulates cellular activity, most importantly cellular brain activity through the use of electrical means. This seems to imply the center of the brain, the brain stem, located in the central region of the brain, is the area targeted in order to achieve control over an individual’s vital functions.

In “The Ego and the Id,” Freud describes what the “critical faculty” actually is, something he failed to do in his essay “Group Psychology and the analysis of the Ego” (1921). The “critical faculty” becomes associated with the superego. The superego is what allows the mind a way to counter destruction through deliberate forms of self-restraint. It is here, I wonder if the wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture is acting as an “artificial superego” in restraining the subject / victim from the performance of routine exercise, and thereby subsequently making difficult the performance of other beneficial activities? For the unspoken, unarticulated dialogue of the wireless electromagnetic frequency assaults during my early morning exercise routine speaks to me as, “You must not indulge your own vanity with such superficial and narcissistic aims.” By directing the destructive power of wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture towards an impulse, one that is routinely performed at the same time every day, such as my early morning routine exercise was accomplished, one can convert, through subterfuge, the behavior through a form of policing and monitoring of the subject / victim’s daily activities. And thus, the perpetrator, via the wireless electromagnetic frequency assaults, destroys a little bit of the subject / victim’s identity (a soul murder indeed) with the destruction of the subject victim’s ego. (see “60 Minutes,” Scott Pelly’s investigation of “Targeting Americans” (Havana Syndrome) aired March 31st 2024). Hence, my theory, wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture’s purpose is one of mind control and subjection, but one that also requires the diligent and attentive monitoring and surveillance of subject / victim(s). And, furthermore, as an expression of the death drive, which, in fact, the superego acts as an expression of the death drive, the “artificial superego’s” aim is ultimately destruction of the subject / victim’s ego itself along with pieces of their own acquired self-identity. One must acknowledge, a moderate form of monitoring can explode into excessive micro-management and a form of mania, but only if the “artificial superego” (i.e. wireless electromagnetic frequency assault is left unchecked). This is also the psychoanalytical analysis of the function of direct energy weapons against human populations such has occurred in the targeting of U.S. government intelligence officials abroad and known as “Havana Syndrome.” I am haunted with what can best be described as intentionally induced weakness, passive obedience, insecurity, induced trauma through the denial of my own psychic re-enactment of masculinity. With the traumatic loss induced by the pain and suffering of wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture and my personal identity, my daily routine morning exercise reflected the “active masculine” through sports performance drills, weightlifting, and high intensity interval training (HiiT). What cases of traumatic losses has demonstrated to us is the introjected object remains an undigested “bad object.” In the psychic paradigm of Oedipal relations this is the maternal object and feminine weakness that runs counter, not only to all human psychic relations, but also runs counter to popular U.S. cultural values. This can haunt the psyche as an alien presence. The attempt to kill it or evacuate it may take most of the person’s energy requiring protection from a “superior object.” This “superior object” is identified as the “superego” to establish some kind of stability in the psyche (Weiland, 1996). However, the “artificial superego” in my case seeks to immobilize and reconfigure the subject/ victim’s own superego against the performance of diet and exercise already put in place through education and learning. In this sense, it creates the fantasy of control over the female victim’s body, control that is bound to the fear and terror of infantile anxieties associated with feelings of love, hate, envy, greed, and need toward the maternal object. Indeed, in modifying and tightly controlling this body, one can feel as if they expelled a “bad object” felt to be “polluting” or “impure” or “tainted”. Yet, at the same time, deeply identified with the actual body itself. In modifying the “Object-Other”, the perpetrator may come to feel as if they’ve “evicted the powerful other”. In this case, the representation of the Oedipal father with his “superior strength and phallus” because weightlifting is symbolic with the strength and power of the father, as is thinness, thanks to advertising campaigns of the 1970s which ushered in feelings of worthlessness in women who didn’t maintain supermodel stature. Indeed, this move toward tearing down another to “shore up” the perpetrators own damaged ego is a psychic defense. In another paradigm, women who cut and modify their own bodies may feel it is the only way of expelling an object felt to be threatening, alien, or polluting to the body in some way. Plastic surgery and cosmetic procedures become a way to reclaim the self and evict the powerful, pre-Oedipal mother, who, now inevitably aging, inhabits the female psyche as a specter. But this evacuation is an illusion because the introjected “bad object” of the maternal can never fully be evacuated from the psyche. Like a phantom, she remains hidden in the shadows waiting to re-emerge again and again. Aggression and hatred towards the maternal object require a slow and gradual working through of the negative feelings associated with the original introjected “bad object.” And, through “triggering,” one can find themselves experiencing the infantile anxieties all over again. Without proper working through, it will be doomed to forever be expressed, at times, as a violent rupture. It is the same course of action required for the narcissistic, self-centered belief in one’s own “superior, powerful, ego,” which I believe , may be one of the reasons for my harassment and torture. That is, the narcissism associated with the masculine independent superiority and fear of feminine weakness. This is why it is my belief, the technology is part of a wireless mind control technology used to humiliate, degrade, and harass the “Object-Other.” The perpetrator issuing forth the wireless technology feels threatened by, albeit, and where no real threat ever really existed, by a phantom specter in their psyche.

As I have stated previously, feminist author Julia Kristeva informs us “the loss of the mother is a biological and psychic necessity,” and one of the first steps we take toward the becoming autonomous beings (Kristeva, 1989). That is to say, with the longed for identification and idealization of the paternal phallus in all its superiority, there must be a repudiation of feminine weakness, and abjection to feminine inferiority in order for each of us, men and women alike, to establish individual identity. Thus, matricide as separation from the maternal object, rejection of feminine weakness and embracing the desire of phallic potency and equality becomes woman’s, as well as men’s, vital necessity in human development. It is “the sine qua non of individuation, that it take place under optimal circumstances and can be eroticized … (Kristeva, 1989, pg. 27-28).” However, the dissolution of the Oedipus complex, Freud describes, is certainly not a resolution or slow working through of feelings. The castration complex, based on sexual monism, is the prime mover.

These works imply that the use of wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture impose psychic loss into the subject/victim’s psyche by diminishing the internal idealized father’s strength and power, via induced pain and suffering that moves the subject / victim into a state of vulnerability and a state of inferior feminine weakness. The perpetrator, by purging his/her own infantile anxieties into the subject / victim as “a container of all those things bad,” thereby liberates himself from the psychic suffering of possessing those very feelings. The Oedipus complex certainly suggests that it should not be the father who is killed. That this “superior other” remain intact. In other words, matricide, or killing off those feelings associated with maternal weakness, inferiority, and vulnerability becomes our vital necessity if we are to liberate ourselves from our maternal object’s “oppressive presence.” It is as Kristeva tells us, “Matricide becomes our vital necessity (Kristeva, 1989).” But it should take place via a slow, gradual, separation based on the working through of feelings of loss and aggression. Otherwise, the dissolution of the Oedipus complex manifest as a violent rupture, a violent separation as its only alternative to psychic survival. “Possessions, as we know, are narcissistic extensions of the self. Thus, the boy’s inadequate separation from the mother, the traumatic loss of her, as well as the internalization of her as a “bad object” come back as the inability of a culture to allow a full independent feminine/maternal “other” … (Weiland, 1996).” Thus, the castrated mother becomes the only possible mother imago.

With regard to the creation of an “artificial superego” via wireless electromagnetic frequency, consider the following postulated by Judith Butler (2021):

“… impulse is structured either by the power … [that] repressed [it] … (which designates and shapes it in some way) or by that power … [that] liberated [it] (which endows it with specific meaning in relation to the prior repression) … The impulse is the same whether it is inhibited or expressed. But if it matters through what means the inhibition has been enforced, and if that means crafts the content of the repressed, then the emergence of the formally inhibited impulse does not simply push aside the inhibiting force: rather, it wages and orchestrated attack on that form of power, debunking its reasons, its legitimacy, its claims (Butler, 2021, pg. 165).”

So, if we consider wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture as the creation of an “artificial superego,” repressing my impulse for health, beauty, and wellness via the systematic punishment of torture during early morning routine exercise or during periods of beneficial activities as a Pavlovian deterrent; it has thereby crafted the content of the repressed as something belonging to “self indulgence,” “vanity,” and “superficial narcissistic aims.” And it seeks to replace it with another type of action. But what action and for whose benefit? Post hypnotic suggestion may provide us with answers as induced forms of sedated states can make the subjects/ victims highly suggestible and open to manipulation and exploitation. For this reason, I turn to a journal article in Violence and Gender, “Early Identifications of Grooming and Targeting in Predatory Sexual Behavior on College Campuses” (2019). The conclusion of the article states;

“Sexual predatory behavior is a complicated, diverse topic with a rich research base within criminology, education, and psychology. The behaviors and attitudes of the sexual predator should be seen as a varied typology rather than a singular construct. There are some who seek out victims to exert their own power and control cravings, others simply seek the path of least resistance when it comes to sexual gratification by identifying vulnerable populations and using grooming behaviors to reduce defensiveness [i.e. alcohol, drugs, and most recently, the use of electromagnetic frequency assault torture to induce states of sedation/ stupor].* The goal of this article is to help the reader better understand the risk factors associated with sexual assault and develop a broader awareness of those individuals who manipulate the definitions of personal agency and consent, and use alcohol to blur the lines between consensual sexual interactions and rape. Our intent is not to create an apology or lessen the heinousness of these motivations, but rather shine light on the motivations of those who manipulate and take from others.

It is with appreciation, camradery, and a shared vision that we support the viral spread of the #metoo movement. We recognize and applaud those silence- breakers, who have experienced sexual assault, harassment, stalking, and manipulative behaviors, and their strength coming forward to share their stories and shed light into the darkness of sexual predatory behaviors, whether these be particularly egregious, as with rape and domestic violence, or those behaviors that create a fertile ground for toxic masculinity and misogyny, reducing victims confidence or shaming those who speak out.

We share the societal concern about those icons in our community, acting from positions of power and popularity, who abuse their status and intimidate others into a submission and silence. It is our hope that this research brings awareness and continues the work done by others in the fields to better reduce sexual predation on the college campus and in the wider community (Van Brunt, Murphy, Pescara-Kovac, and Crance, 2019).”

*Bracketed text inserted by author of this blog.

We live in a society that fails to acknowledge the long-term consequences of violence.

“Violent encounters destabilize many of those who fall victim to them, as well as many of those who mete out the violence, but they also have a corrosive effect on the psyches of those of us, clinicians included, who stand by and watch, or hear about an event thirdhand or through the media. Knowledge of violence has the potential to destabilize bystanders, distant witnesses who are often many times removed from the immediacy of the disaster ... for many people … caught between the fascination of the abomination and the powerless disgust, indifference becomes the most adaptive position (Harris & Botticelli et. al., 2010, pg.30-31).”

It is for this reason many individuals consider large cities “factories that produce psychopaths” because of the “bystander effect,” the isolation we may feel in the presence of diverse communities with different peoples who may not hold the same values as we do, the falling away of religious beliefs and values, and the media’s role in airing frequent violent acts, which in turn, desensitize the population from feeling its impact, by experiencing the horror of events over and over again.

Jean-Max Gaudilliere, in discussing resistance to cure and man’s resistance to prohibit war writes:

“ … the 20th century has seen a great increase in the number of psychiatrists who treat trauma, a number reduced to just a few in times of peace. With each new conflict, mental health services always suffers the same lack of resources they did in the last war. (Harris & Botticelli, 2010, pg.16).”

When war- time conflict returns to peacetime following negotiations and treaty, people seem reasonably happy to return to and enjoy their life under the new protections. These new protections may be called borders, or natural borders, historical borders, linguistic borders, and so on. “But history teaches us that every border is the political result of a treaty, and a treaty the judicial result of negotiations between former foes. Peace is only the fragile and temporarily result of former wars (Harris and Botticelli, 2010, pg.16).”

“What can this tell us about wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture?”

In my opinion, it teaches us that the victims of wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture are in a war with a paranoid schizoid, and one who has no respect for the individual’s private, intimate, and personal boundaries because the perpetrator sees the victim as “non-human” much like how enemy foes perceive each other whether as: Jew, Gentile, Christian, Serb, Russian, Catholic, Protestant, etc.

Francis Graceland (1946) in the American Journal of psychiatry wrote:

“When the final history of WW II is written, and like all history is entombed in large volumes, to the student who reads it carefully, it will reveal the same lessons which are learned so painfully and at such great cost in all wars. Each successive war necessarily brings with it new problems, but the old ones crop up repeatedly; and, as we encounter them again and again, we wonder why man is so slow to profit by experience and history. Perhaps, the cynic expressed it best of all, when he said “Men learn from history that men learn nothing from history (pg. 587).”

At this point, I would like to turn to the work of Katie Gentile, “Creating Bodies: Eating Disorders as Self-Destructive Survival (2007) and parallel the differences between male pattern violent destruction, such as occurs with wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture against what feminine self-destructive violence means, respectively.

Sexual abuse has been highly correlated time and time again with the self-destructive survival of eating disorders occurring predominantly in women (Schwartz & Cohen et. al., 1996). In the family environment, sexual abuse can take on a particularly creepy nature. For some women, sexual abuse can exist just under the skin, in the unacknowledged intentionality and unconscious fantasies of both parents (Gentile, 2007, pg. 83-95). But it can also, at the same time, mean the inappropriate invasion and penetration of merger of the child, in the coital sexual sense, by an adult or supervising individual. That is, in the private spaces that make up gendered bodies. For women, sexual abuse takes on symbolic meaning in bulimia. With this type of eating disorder, the penetration of assaults of purging, via induced vomiting, reflects the abusive invasion and control by one or both parents. For men, physical and sexual abuse in early childhood can take on the symbolic meaning of serial rape and serial murder. The act of dominant control by men over women, and women over their own bodies in self-destructive ways that harm, becomes the reenactment of a hegemonic dynamic of power relations over a past lost love object. Namely, the maternal object. Both diseases are artifacts stemming from the original execution or soul murder of the psyche. That is to say, stemming from sexual abuse, neglect, and early childhood trauma (Jacobs, 2007; Gentile, 2007; Grand, 2000). Put simply, when the death drive (instinct) is turned inward it creates masochism and self-destructive tendencies, but when it is turned outward it takes the form of aggression and destruction on the “Other.” Holmes (2013) writing on Freud’s analysis of human destructiveness associated with war describes it as, “the blindest fury of destructiveness which is an instinct accompanied by an extraordinarily high degree of narcissistic enjoyment. This inclination to aggressiveness is an original, self-abusing instinctual disposition in man, and it constitutes the greatest impediment to civilization (Holmes, 2013, pg. 144).”

With regard to wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture, which has already been described as belonging to “the masculine symbolic,” penetrating phallus, via the use of an artificial medium, wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture seeks to accomplish the penetration, invasion, and merger with the subject/victim. We now can infer the perpetrator using the wireless technology may have suffered at the hands of an abusive parent, guardian, or some other childhood authoritarian figure or suffered from depriving and disappointing environments the likes of which occur during and in the aftermath of war and poverty.

Sigmund Freud’s reflection on the human forces of destruction focus on the possibility of the destruction of other people’s lives, especially under conditions of war, in which the technology of weaponry amplifies the powers of human destructiveness. Freud’s profile of advancing technological weaponry was identified as the repetitive character of destruction (Butler, 2021 pg. 159). Freud also considered how destruction works not only against others (i.e. sexual assault, battering, murder, etc.) But against oneself in self-destructive repetitive behaviors (i.e. eating disorders, self-cutting, self-mutilation, self castration, etc.)

We can consider the use of wireless electromagnetic frequency assault torture, the use of microwave energy and acoustic weapons, to the reflections of Sigmund Freud and Albert Einstein during WW I and WW II in which destruction of other people’s lives, especially under conditions of war, in which the advancement of technological weaponry amplified the powers of human destructiveness.

In my next post, I will follow-up this line of thought with Sigmund Freud’s “Beyond the Pleasure Principle.”

Sources:

Butler, J. (2021) The Force of Non-Violence: An ethico-political bind. London. Verso.

Corporate Broadcasting System (Producer) (2024). “The Targeting of America.” 60 Minutes. New York, NY. March 31st 2024.

Freud, S. (1921). Group Psychology and the analysis of the Ego. In J. Strachey (Ed & Trans), Standard Edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 18, pp. 65-144). London. Hogarth Press.

Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. In J. Strachey (Ed & Trans), Standard Edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 3-68). London Hogarth Press.

Gentile, K. (2007). Creating Bodies: Eating Disorders as Self-Destructive Survival. London. The Analytic Press.

Graceland, F. (1946). Psychiatric lessons from World War II. American Journal of Psychiatry, 103, 587-593.

Grand, S. (2000). The Reproduction of Evil: A clinical and cultural perspective. London. The Analytic Press.

First Do No Harm: The paradoxical encounters of psychoanalysis, warmaking, and resistance. Eds., Adrian Harris and Steven Botticelli. Volume 45, Relational Perspective Book Series. New York. Routledge.

Homes, L. (2008). The Internal Triangle: New theories in female development. New York. Jason Aronson.

Homes, L. (2013). Wrestling with Destiny: The promise of psychoanalysis. New York. Routledge.

Jacobs, A. (2007) On Matricide: Myth, psychoanalysis, and the law of the mother. New York. Columbia University Press.

Christina J. (1989) Black Sun. New York. Columbia University Press.

Schwartz, M. & Cohen, L. (1996) Sexual Abuse and Eating Disorders. Bristol, PA. Brunner/ Mazel.

Van Brunt, B., Murphy, A., Pescara-Kovach, L., Crance, G. “Early Identification of Grooming and Targeting and Predatory Sexual Behavior on College Campuses.” Violence and Gender. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 1.

Wieland, C. Matricide and Destructiveness: Infantile anxieties and technological culture. British Journal of Psychotherapy. Vol. 12. No. 3 (1996) 300-313.